Recent Posts in Family Law Category
| February 05, 2010 |
| Who Gets What in a Pennsylvania Divorce? |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
Pennsylvania is not a 50/50 state. It is an equitable distribution state regarding the division of property in a
divorce proceeding. Specifically, i
n an action for
divorce or annulment in Pennsylvania, the court shal
l, upon request of either party, equitably divide, distribute or assign, in kind or otherwise, the marital property between the parties without regard to marital misconduct in such proportions and in such manner as the courtdeems just after considering all relevant factors, including:
1. The length of the marriage.
2. Any prior
marriage of either party
3. The age, health, station, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities and needs of each of the parties.
4. The contribution by one party to the education, training or increased earning power of the other party.
5. The opportunity of each party for future acquisitions of capital assets and income.
6. The sources of income of both parties, including, but not limited to, medical, retirement, insurance or other benefits.
7. The contribution or dissipation of each party in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation of the marital property, including the contribution of a party as homemaker.
8. The value of the property set apart to each party.
9. The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage.
10. The economic circumstances of each party, including Federal, State and local tax ramifications, at the time the division of property is to become effective.
11. Whether the party will be serving as the custodian of any dependent minor children.
All real or personal property acquired by either party during the marriage is presumed to be marital property regardless of whether title is held individually or by the parties in some form of co-ownership such as joint tenancy, tenancy in common or tenancy by the entirety. [Based on Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes - Title 23 - Sections: 3501 & 3502]
As you can see, there are many factors to consider when dividing martial property. For this reason, it is best to consult with an
experienced attorney to learn your rights.
If you have any specific questions regarding
divorces in Pennsylvania, please
contact, L. Anthony
Bompiani, Esquire at (724) 925-9600.
|
 |
| Continue reading "Who Gets What in a Pennsylvania Divorce?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| January 29, 2010 |
| How Much Will Tiger's Divorce Cost? |
| Posted By Bompiani Law Group LLC |
 |
How Much Would Tiger's Divorce Cost?
Amid reports that his wife Elin Nordegren is consulting with a high-powered divorce attorney, Tiger Woods and his estimated net worth of $600 million - considered one of the biggest in professional sports, thanks in large part to sponsorship endorsements worth some $1 billion - is coming under scrutiny, should a divorce necessitate a need to divide his estate.
In addition to issues of
custody involving the couple's two children, Sam, 2, and Charlie, 10 months, other issues would include the location of the
divorce filing and what terms were specified in any prenuptial agreement.
Reports indicate that a prenuptial agreement was executed before Woods, 33, and Nordegren, 29, were married in Barbados in 2004.
However, prenuptial agreements are not always black and white. Specifically, a prenuptial agreement can be challenged on various issues including whether or not both parties fully disclosed all assets owned at the time of the execution of the agreement.
Tiger's admission of infidelity would likely not affect the agreement, unless the prenuptial agreement states otherwise. Thus, unless infidelity was addressed on the face of the agreement, Tiger's actions would not make the document unenforceable.
As residents of Florida, Woods and Nordegren would not be subject to California's 50-50 community property laws, though they did, in fact, live in the Western state earlier in their marriage. However, they have lived in Florida long enough to file there.
Much like Pennsylvania, Florida is an equitable distributions state, meaning that the property must be divided equitably based on various factors. Remember, equitably does not necessarily mean equally. Even though Tiger has made most of the money that makes up the estate, the law could distribute more to his wife if the court determines that she became accustomed to that life-style over the course of their marriage.
If you have any detailed questions regarding divorces in Pennsylvania, please
contact, L. Anthony
Bompiani, Esquire at (724) 925-9600.
|
 |
| Continue reading "How Much Will Tiger's Divorce Cost?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| January 22, 2010 |
| Do Grandparents Have Custody Rights in Pennsylvania? |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
|
Pennsylvania law provides that the grandparents of a minor child do have legal standing to bring a
custody action against the parents of the minor child, but only in certain circumstances.
Specifically, a grandparent may be entitled to PARTIAL
CUSTODY AND VISITATION if the child has resided with his/her grandparents for a period of 12 months or more and is subsequently removed from the home by his/her parents. In that situation, the grandparents may petition the court for an order granting them reasonable partial custody or visitation rights, or both, to the child. The court then shall grant the petition if it finds that visitation rights would be in the best interest of the child and would not interfere with the parent-child relationship.
Additionally, a court may award PHYSICAL AND LEGAL
CUSTODY to the grandparents, if it is in the best interest of the child not to be in the custody of either parent, and if it is in the best interest of the child to be in the custody of the grandparent. However, this only applies to a grandparent:
1. Who has a genuine care and concern for the child;
2. Whose relationship with the child began with the consent of a parent of the child or pursuant to an order of court; and
3. Who for 12 months has assumed the role and responsibilities of the child's parent, providing for the physical, emotional and social needs of the child, or who assumes the responsibility for a child who has been determined to be a dependent child (relating to juvenile matters), or who assumes or deems it necessary to assume responsibility for a child who is substantially at risk due to parental abuse, neglect, drug or alcohol abuse or mental illness.
This is a summary of the law in Pennsylvania regarding a grandparent's custody rights. If you have a detailed question regarding your particular situation, please
contact, L. Anthony
Bompiani, Esquire at (724) 925-9600.
|
 |
| Continue reading "Do Grandparents Have Custody Rights in Pennsylvania?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| January 08, 2010 |
| A Friendly Divorce Alternative? |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
The following article was written by Mark Schlueb of The Orlando Sentinel:
You’ve heard of happily married, but is it possible to have a happy divorce?
A
growing number of lawyers - including some who’ve spent careers
brawling in divorce court - say yes. They’re disciples of
“collaborative divorce,” which tries to bring civility and cooperation
to the traditionally bitter battle over the kids, family home and
Grandma’s silver.
Rather
than each spouse paying a pit-bull attorney to spar in court, they and
both attorneys agree to work out an amicable divorce that both sides
can be happy with. Along the way, they receive guidance from a neutral
mental-health professional and financial adviser.
Collaborative
law’s converts say it can be faster, less divisive and cheaper than a
traditional divorce. And because the parties may never step into a
courtroom until final paperwork is filed, it’s more private - probably
the reason celebrities such as Roy Disney and Robin Williams chose it.
“It’s
so much better for clients and their families. In my experience it
reduces the costs significantly, and the results are better,” Orlando
attorney Richard West said.
In
the collaborative process, husbands and wives have their own lawyers,
but they’re there to provide legal advice, not extract a pound of flesh
from the other side. The parties and the lawyers sign an agreement at
the outset to share all information.
The divorcing couple is
free to back out if talks fail, but then they have to get new lawyers.
That’s because the attorneys agree to drop out if the collaborative
process fails - a way to make sure they work hard to come up with a
fair agreement.
Click here to read the entire article written by Mr. Schlueb.
Should
you have any further questions regarding divorce law and/or
collaborative law in Pennsylvania, contact L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire
at (724) 925-9600. |
 |
| Continue reading "A Friendly Divorce Alternative?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| November 06, 2009 |
| What is Marital Property? |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
Generally
speaking, all property acquired by either party during the marriage,
including the increase in value of any nonmarital property up to the
date of separation, is presumed to be marital property, regardless of
whether title is held individually or by the parties in some form of
co-ownership, such as tenancy in common, joint tenancy, or tenancy by
the entirety.
But, as with any good American law, there are many
exceptions. Specifically, the presumption of marital property is
overcome by showing that:
1. The property was acquired in exchange for property acquired prior to marriage;
2.
The property was acquired by gift (except between spouses), bequest,
devise or descent. (Gifts between spouses are marital property.) ;
3. The property was acquired after final separation, except for property acquired in exchange for marital assets;
4. The property was excluded by a valid agreement of the parties entered into before, during, or after the marriage;
5.
A party has sold, granted, conveyed, or otherwise disposed of the
property in good faith and for value prior to the date of final
separation;
6. The property is a veteran benefit exempt from attachment, levy, or seizure;
7. The property has been mortgaged or otherwise encumbered in good faith, for value, prior to the date of final separation; or
8.
The property was received as a result of an award or settlement for a
cause of action that arose before the date of the marriage, or after
the date of final separation, regardless of when the payment was
received.
Attorney L. Anthony Bompiani handles many cases in the areas of divorce and custody disputes. Should you have any further questions regarding
divorces and the distribution of marital property, contact L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire at (724) 925-9600.
|
 |
| Continue reading "What is Marital Property?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| September 26, 2009 |
| Bar Association Wades Into Divorce Law Spat |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
The Boston Bar Association drew heavy criticism this week after throwing its support behind one of two dueling alimony reform bills currently up for debate in the state Legislature.
The current law — which does not allow judges to cap the duration of an alimony award, enabling post-divorce payments that last a lifetime — has drawn fierce criticism for decades. Opponents of the legislation say countless alimony payers have been forced to shell out high percentages of their annual earnings to support ex-spouses who don’t want to work. Alimony payers say they’ve been forced into bankruptcy, or even jail, because of the rigid legislation.
Pennsylvania's alimony laws, although not very clear, are much less rigid. All aspects of the marriage and divorce are taken into account including length of marriage, age of the parties, income, and earning potential of the parties. Lifetime alimony is only awarded in the most obvious of situations.
For more information regarding divorce and alimony in Pennsylvania, contact L. Anthony Bompiani at (724) 925-9600.
|
 |
| Continue reading "Bar Association Wades Into Divorce Law Spat" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| September 11, 2009 |
| Modifying Child Support in Pennsylvania |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
The court that makes the original child
support award is said to have continuing
jurisdiction to modify the order as conditions warrant. Provisions
regarding child support, visitation and custody within a Settlement Agreement
are also subject to court modification under certain circumstances. That being
so, either parent may request the court to change the order throughout the
duration of the child's minority. Modifications will not happen automatically.
One of the parents must request the change by a formal motion to the
court.
Child support orders cannot be changed
on caprice or because a court thinks that "it is time." It must be
based on evidence proving that sufficient grounds exist to make the change.
This usually requires a showing of changed
circumstances from the facts as they existed at the time that the last
order was entered. (In the many years a child support order remains effective,
the parent's circumstances may change many times and thus so may the child
support order.) In Pennsylvania, appropriate circumstances means a
substantial change in income. Please note that past child support obligations
cannot be modified. Modifications are not retroactive. Thus, if there is a
change in circumstances it is very important that the affected party petition
for a change in child support as soon as the substantial change has
occurred.
Many different scenarios can create
changed circumstances. For example, if the paying parent has had a large
increase in income, the court can order the child support increased. Or, if the
child's needs grow, such as if the child becomes ill or disabled, the amount of
support can be ordered raised.
Support
can also be reduced upon a
proper showing. For example, if the custodial parent receives a
substantial raise or otherwise has an increased ability to support the
children,
support payments may be reduced. Or, if the paying parent loses his or
her job,
the court can be asked to reduce support during the period of
unemployment.
Attorney L. Anthony Bompiani represents individuals involved in all
types of family law disputes. Call today for a free consultation. (724) 925-9600
|
 |
| Continue reading "Modifying Child Support in Pennsylvania" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| August 18, 2009 |
| Questions You Should Ask Your Divorce Attorney |
| Posted By |
 |
Here are some questions you should consider asking your divorce attorney before you hire him or her. The answers will help you get an idea of the attorney's knowledge and experience. You will also learn what the approximate costs involved will be. It is always best for you and your attorney to be on the same page throughout the entire case.
1. What is the retainer amount? Is any of it refunded if I should
change my mind or we decide to not go through with the divorce?
2. What other types of charges besides attorneys fees will there
likely be? (long distance telephone, copies, facsimile charges, etc.)
3. Describe a time line for how you believe my divorce will progress.
4. Do you have a set procedure for handling a divorce case? If so,
please describe how you would proceed with a typical divorce case.
5. What do you expect from me as a client?
6. How long have you been practicing law?
7. In how many divorce cases have you been involved?
8. What percentage of your practice is dedicated to family law cases?
9. What is your hourly rate or do you charge a fixed price?
10. What is the retainer amount? Is any of it refunded if I should
change my mind or we decide to not go through with the divorce?
11. What other types of charges besides attorneys fees will there
likely be? (long distance telephone, copies, facsimile charges, etc.)
12. Describe how you believe my divorce will progress.
13. What specific advise do you have for my case?
Attorney L. Anthony Bompiani represents individuals involved in all types of family law disputes. Call today for a free consultation. (724) 925-9600
|
 |
| Continue reading "Questions You Should Ask Your Divorce Attorney" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| July 16, 2009 |
| Collaborative Law and Divorce |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
Collaborative
Law is the practice and art of settling cases with legal counsel, but
without court intervention at any stage. All negotiations take place in
four-way conferences between the parties and their attorneys. Each
client has built-in legal advice and advocacy during negotiations and
each attorney is committed to guiding the clients toward reasonable
solutions.
The attorneys cannot go to court or threaten to
go to court. In fact, at the beginning of the proceed, all parties and
attorneys sign a contract agreeing that if either party decides to take
the case to court, then both parties must hire new attorneys. This puts
the responsibility on the attorneys to keep the case under control,
which is very important in divorce cases. In Collaborative Law,
settlement is the only agenda and all involved rely upon an atmosphere
of cooperation and professionalism.
For more information
regarding the Collaborative Law movement in Pennsylvania, contact L.
Anthony Bompiani, Esquire at (724) 925-9600.
|
 |
| Continue reading "Collaborative Law and Divorce" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| June 09, 2009 |
| GIFTS: Are they marital or non-marital property? |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
When
I am meeting with a prospective divorce client for the first time, one
of the most common questions I hear is whether or not a gift is
considered marital property or non-marital property. The answer, like
in any legal situation, is it depends. You knew I was going to say
that, right?
Generally speaking, gifts to one specific spouse from a third party are
non-marital property. Thus, they are the sole property of the receiving
spouse. For this to be true, it needs to be clear that the gift was
made from a third party to one spouse. It cannot be a gift to both
spouses jointly (i.e. wedding gifts, anniversary gifts, etc.).
Now, I use the word "generally," because, as always, there are some
exceptions. For example, once a receiving spouse "co-mingles" the gift
with joint property, or "transfers" the gift to both spouses jointly,
the gift becomes marital. To illustrate this point I give you the
following example. Joe Husband receives a gift of $10,000.00 from his
Father who is executing his estate plan. Joe takes the $10,000.00 and
deposits it in "his" Certificate of Deposit account. At this time, the
gift is non-marital. But then Joe, being the loving husband that he is,
transfers it to a Certificate of Deposit account jointly owned with
Jane Wife. The gift, upon transfer, becomes marital property.
One slight twist you should know is that any appreciation in value during the marriage of a non-marital gift, is marital.
Finally, gifts between spouses are marital property and will be divided
through the equitable distribution process. So, ladies, that diamond
ring he bought you for Christmas? Should you get divorced, it is just
as much his as it is yours.
|
 |
| Continue reading "GIFTS: Are they marital or non-marital property?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| May 22, 2009 |
| Major Change in Child Custody Law Proposed in House Bill 463 |
| Posted By L. Anthony Bompiani, Esquire |
 |
Representative Robert E. Belfanti, Jr. (D) of the 107th Legislative District of Pennsylvania (Montour County and part of Northumberland County), is the prime sponsor of House Bill 463. The bill, if passed could have a major impact on child custody cases in Pennsylvania as an amendment to Section 5303 of Title 23.
The new law would require that "An order for joint custody shall be
awarded by the court unless the court finds that joint custody is not
in the best interest of the child." Furthermore, the law would
establish a "rebuttable presumption that an award of joint custody is
in the best interest of the child." It also would require the court to
"state on record the reason for any award other than an award of joint
custody."
The way the law stands now, there is no such presumption. In fact, an
order for joint custody (50/50 physical custody) is rarely entered
without a fight.
How do you feel about PA HB 463? Leave your comments and thoughts. More importantly, you should contact your local representative to voice your opinions.
|
 |
| Continue reading "Major Change in Child Custody Law Proposed in House Bill 463" » |
|
Permalink |
| | |